Sir,
Your February 7th article,
Ethnic Cleansing in Luoland, is dangerously misleading, and omits crucial information about the ongoing violence in Kenya.
The term "ethnic cleansing" is both inaccurate and unhelpful to Kenya's current crisis. It fuels the build up by the Kibaki (PNU) camp to the declaration of a state of emergency, the deployment of the military or, worse, the usurpation of civilian governance by military governance.
Unquestionably, victims of the current violence experience the violence as being directed at their ethnicity. But the violence is politically-instigated. It finds ethnic expression or manifests itself ethnically because Kenyan politics are organised ethnically.
The first wave of violence in Western Kenya took the form of spontaneous, disorganized protest, against the announcement of a presidential result that both domestic and international observers have judged to be deeply flawed and lacking in credibility. It was met with a second form of violence, extraordinary force by the police and GSU paramilitary forces. Data collected by civil society and human rights organizations show the majority of deaths in Nyanza and Western provinces to be the result of extra-judicial killings by police and GSU, not civilian attacks on other civilians.
The third form of violence in Western Kenya is organized militia activity, directly traceable to specific leaders, in both the PNU and ODM. You neglect to mention that in the week preceding this article, two parliamentarians of the ODM party were murdered, in suspicious circumstances that carried all the hallmarks of political assassination. And that 25 Kikuyu civil society leaders, who have spoken out against human rights abuses and
electoral malpractices, have received death threats.
Much of the destruction to businesses and property in Kisumu could have been averted by the speedy deployment of security forces to Western Kenya, in the immediate aftermath of the election, to restore law and order. Instead, the majority of Kenya's police force and GSU security force were diverted to surround Uhuru Park, the City Mortuary, and the slum areas of Nairobi, to prevent civilian assembly and peaceful protest. The "government" clearly made a decision to let Kisumu burn, and to leave its overwhelmed, outnumbered, and exhausted police force to resort to bullets in the absence of support or relief.
Kenya's hope lies now in the ongoing mediation process, led by Kofi Annan. All forms of international pressure that keep the PNU leaders at the negotiating table - such as the recent US travel ban on hardliners - should be encouraged. The responsibility of journalists, and publications like the Economist, is to name the violence correctly, hold the initiators accountable, and present the conflict in Kenya for what it is - a politically-instigated catastrophe, with a political solution.
Shailja Patel
4 Comments:
Hi Shailja
A few questions which I hope you can address.
I know the term "ethnic cleansing" is a highly contested term especially in relation to the "forced evictions" (it's so easy to type "ethnic cleansing" at that point) but I want to understand why you do not think these incidents do not fit the criteria.
An ethnic group were forced to move from one geographic location by another to "cleanse" the neighbourhood. Information I have seen points to this as the end result of a campaign run by certain politicians who described Kikuyus as "rubbish" that would be cleared whether Odinga got into power or not. That statement does not lay the blame at Odinga's feet by the way.
Saying you will clear the land of rubbish and having people use violence to terrify and scare people into leaving their homes, their land smacks of ethnic cleansing. This kind of campaign had been run before and succeeded in displacing many Kenyans who now landless reside in the slums which have become the hotbed of radical activism in a country which has low employment rates. Those slums have also been ethnically cleansed. You've got people in IDP camps who are also stratified by tribe and I hear much to my sorrow that those Luos who took shelter in Nairobi's IDP camps are not receiving the same treatment that Kikuyus did prior to their arrival.
Something is happening to Kenyan society that if we do not directly address and name it will fester.
I think we need a term to describe what is happening in the Rift Valley and for me that term is "ethnic cleansing." If we don't call it this, what is it? I notice those in the ODM camp are using the less innocuous term "forced eviction" which makes it sound like the kind of interaction that goes on between a landlord and his/her tenants. Is that really the case here? I don't think so.
I know this is painful for Kenyans to address but trying to evade naming this is only going to allow it to fester. As it has done since 1992.
I have encountered arguments by Kenyans who say its not ethnic cleansing because for it to fit the definition state actors must be involved. That's not looking at the causes again. I can see why it might be politically incorrect to call this an ethnic cleansing when there are people in the opposition who incited people to attack their neighbours and are lock, stock and barrel part of Kenya's politics. To go after them will be to exacerbate even greater hostility among their supporters and they are loose cannons rattling around on Kenya's decks right now. Attacking with impunity Kikuyus. I'd like to say more but for the time being Ill be brief.
Yes, there are different levels of violence taking place which you have pointed out. By the way, I am neither in the ODM or PNU camp although I feel as incensed by the injustice of Kibaki's electoral fraud as strongly as anyone in the ODM camp. I still maintain it's ethnic cleansing but if you can demonstrate why it is not, I would welcome your thoughts.
Peace
Carol
PS thanks for your kind comments about my blog and thank you for being a moral compass in the darkness that we now find ourselves in.
Why don't you email me?
The PS should just read as Thanks for being a moral compass!
I think your analogy is right on the point. I read that article and it is biased from the beginning to the end. The writer must have been inclined towards a particular direction or probably in favor of some ethnic group in Kenya. I am glad you highlighted this.
I think it was a famous writer from Oakland who said, "A rose by any other name is still a rose."
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home